Read by Mat Pat.
In this study they provide a description of male Mc in the female human brain and specific brain regions. The study was originally trying to determine if women who have been pregnant with son might be more predisposed to certain neurological diseases since these certain diseases occur more frequently in males.
"Collectively with data showing the presence of male DNA in the cerebrospinal fluid , our results indicate that fetal DNA and likely cells can cross the human blood-brain barrier (BBB) and reside the brain. Changes in BBB permeability occur during pregnancy  and may therefore provide a unique opportunity for the establishment of Mc in the brain. Also unique to our study are the findings that male Mc in the human female brain is relatively frequent (positive in 63% of subjects) and distributed in multiple brain regions, and is potentially persistent across the human lifespan (the oldest female in whom male DNA was detected in the brain was 94 years)."
Through the study they blindly and politically assume that all male Mc DNA found hosting in the female brain was from a male pregnancy. Funny how even our brightest scientists can live in denial.
BUT, when they autopsied the brains of women who had never even been pregnant they STILL found male DNA prevalent in the female brain.
They did their best to hide the evidence. They buried it in numerous sub studies but I sifted through it all and found the damning statement, the one they tried to avoid. The statement that every single article written about this extremely
important study completely censored and left out. What are they so afraid of??
"CONCLUSIONS: Male microchimerism was not infrequent in women without sons. Besides known pregnancies, other possible sources of male microchimerism include unrecognized spontaneous abortion, vanished male twin, an older brother transferred by the maternal circulation, or SEXUAL INTERCOURSE. Male microchimerism was significantly more frequent and levels were higher in women with induced abortion than in women with other pregnancy histories. Further studies are needed to determine specific origins of male microchimerism in women." The unambiguous moneyquote. Direct from the scientists themselves, though obviously reluctant to say it.
Its so convenient how they flat out ignore the MOST OBVIOUS source of microchimerism male DNA hosting inside the female body. And the periodicals just deleted it alltogether. The scPost too long. Click here to view the full text.