/giga/ - Gigachad

Name
Email	61275
Subject	Spoiler Image
Comment
File
Password	(For file deletion.)

File: 1656462931032.jpg (14.71 KB, 503x610, ruirjxjfkrAGOOOA.jpg)

Chud 06/29/22 (Wed) 00:35:31 No.1879 [Reply]

>scrolling through netflix
>see new show/movie
>no bipoc or lgbtq+ protagonist
>instantly leave bad review

File: 1656427974641.jpg (48.4 KB, 720x798, 20220628_092745.jpg)

Chud 06/28/22 (Tue) 14:52:54 No.1878 [Reply]

File: 1656411679066.jpg (60.3 KB, 1080x1072, 41ae4ad5a83be76f1df7a7a4cb….jpg)

>any fictional story Chud 06/28/22 (Tue) 10:21:19 No.1876 [Reply]

>2 genders: male and political
>2 races: white and political
>2 sexualities: straight and political
>2 politics: based and political

Chud 06/28/22 (Tue) 14:35:24 No.1877

Nigger

File: 1656275240973.jpg (250.14 KB, 1080x1266, 1610500752080.jpg)

Chud 06/26/22 (Sun) 20:27:21 No.1874 [Reply]

Dead board

Chud 06/27/22 (Mon) 05:13:35 No.1875

File: 1656019246612.jpg (43.59 KB, 822x960, 1630331279157.jpg)

Chud 06/23/22 (Thu) 21:20:46 No.1869 [Reply]

>When applied to Soyical studies, a distinction between ias and nas results in a bricolage of interdisciplinary knowledge that is not mediated by the conventional concepts and discourses of a classic post-historical period and which thus cannot be adequately defended as a form of knowledge, be it biological, social, political, or otherwise. Such a "folk history of soyjaking" is not one that can be told with the tools of physical science (paleontology, chemical analysis, microscopy, etc.) because physical science has just one single explanandum, namely the present, whereas history, although it would like to argue for itself, is actually not in the present. A more fitting phrase for it is the present condition of metaphysics. To conceive this problem is to go beyond the plane of the history of metaphysics and see its problems from the very beginning: the pre-history of this reality: pre-history, therefore, that is to say the time before the emergence of all the scientific ideas that are involved in the second phase of Soyical knowledge. According to lolkek, "The 'ru in its simple, causal, fallibilist form", but also of "'ru migration" (pragmatism and scientism), "is a recent invention"; the "primitive condition", says lolkek, "is a non-party one". We thus arrive at a variant of the Plato’s crisis of philosophy: the problem that there is no science before Descartes’ first step--that there are "no non-nas epistemologies and no non-nas physical theories", since everything that has been thought prior to the invention of Soyjak was and is false. In other words, to think is to do; to jak is to post nas. This thesis seems both correct and wrong at the same time. Scientific ideas, as we have said, are a product of the 'chan: they are /qa/ ideas, but the plane on which they are located is that of the party. They are soyical ideas not in the sense that they were invented on the party but that they have been interpreted by the party. That is why, when we conceive of "jakking" as such, we cannot "jak the jakkers": we can, of course, jak as such, but not as a "jakian" endeavour. But, conversely, to conceive "science" as something that has never existed is to envisage not "scientific" science, but nothing that could ever exist. Thus, to a certain extent, Descartes’s "perfect soyjak" is nothing more than the first stage of thought that came before the moment when we arrive at what, as Soot is wont to say, would now be called "nas brimstone": "that isPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

Chud 06/25/22 (Sat) 03:16:41 No.1873

gem

File: 1634132951259.mp4 (2.48 MB, 720x720, GigaChad.mp4)