"Lolicon" is short for "Lolita complex" at any rate
Do coping newfags not know this?
It's 18 years, though
4chan blew up in 2007
The 4chan building blew up in 2007? Who did it?
What's the problem?
It says pedophile, tho
You're a hecking pedo
>>9341>>9342>google translate therefore true
Lolis look nothing like children, most lolicons hate pedophiles, and we will never be pedophiles
>>9344>artistic recreation depictions of children
Lolis look nothing like children though, this is another commonly debunked argument.
Lolis aren't "muh drawn children", they're lolis. It's useless to refer to them as "children" as that's simply innacurate.
>>9345>Lolis look nothing like children though
They do though
I-it looks nothing like a child, IT JUST DOESN'T OKAY!
theyll unironically say "if you look at this and think of children YOURE secretly the pedo!"
its too funny
This is extremely realistic tho
doesnt matter retard, 99% of yaoi is heavily stylized, actual faggots are disgusting freaks
Not really, it's not stylized enough, the guy in the pic looks very realistic.
i know, i used it as an extreme example
EVEN if you like the more realistic stuff, you're still not a faggot if you dont like men
thats, y'know, the definition of homosexuality
What if you're attracted to the features the guy has in your picture, what does that make you?
dont know, dont care
the definition of homosexuality is quite clear-cut, really not up for interpretation
So if you're attracted to male features, that makes you a homosexual, right?
what retard? art is 100% subjective, its abstract. if a faggot likes heavily stylized drawings for "male features" then maybe, if you just like YAOI itself, as yaoi, then its not gay, since youre not attracted to men. why the fuck is this so hard for brainlets to understand?
What the fuck is the "Yaoi" then, to you?
yaoi is yaoi
trying to say its "this and that depictions of masculine features" etc is just innacurate, because youre basing it off of reality and trying to make a comparison (which its not)
it may have a vaguely masculine resemblance, or may be loosely based on the "concept" of men, but its not men. i hate actual faggots, as do many fudanshi. theres a huge difference between degenerate freaks and just a weird guy who likes a couple drawings. it simply IS NOT MEN.
i know youre retarded, but it cant seriously be that hard to comprehend
Don't you have some children in Thailand to fuck?
stop shilling your shitty twitter account
more like>people who call literally everything pedophilia are usually projecting pedos themselves
Yes, have you seen /qa/ for the last week or so?
Meds chud, it's not just one.
sorry, dont use 4cuck
>>9386>uses stonetoss comic as argument
liking heavily stylized and unrealistic drawings that have nothing to do with reality doenst make you a "pedo"
calling literally everyone a "pedo" makes you a pedo though, as thats a sign of projection, theres countless examples of this
ban this nigger lol
ban everyone who disagrees with me
Ban the pedofag who keeps samefagging and shits up every thread
nobody said this though
i dont get it, they more or less have the same proportions
what hair are you even trying to split?
Built for BHC (big human cock)
I don’t think that this ‘toss is genuine, I could not find the amogus.
It must be an older one, tho