No.17065
lolifags are like troons, very delusional, i don't think they have to remain logically consistent in order to justify their own existence
No.17066
whatever you do, don't go to:
https://www.craiyon.com/and type "sexy naked little girl"
No.17067
>>17066replying to make my post more legible
No.17068
>>17066another reply to stretch it out a bit more
No.17069
>>17066okay three should be enough
No.17071
>>17064If it doesn't result in harm of other people then it's not immoral it is however weird, disgusting and gives people a reason to distrust you.
No.17072
>Trying to rationalize and debate the merits of simulated cp which will inevitably lead to the real thing, as all porn tends to
Hang yourself freak
No.17073
>>17071Shut up faggot. There are forms of morality beyond your shitty postmodern reddit utilitarianism
No.17074
>>17073Yes but they're all retarded.
No.17076
>>17074>leftists accidentally advocate for pedophiliaHow embarrassing!
No.17077
>>17076I'm not a leftist and I'm not advocating for pedophilia.
No.17078
>>17074You're a gay hylic beast. Kill yourself.
No.17079
>>17077Yes you are. If you aren't willing to condemn it and use Satanic individualist principles to justify someone wanting to molest children you're complicit in their deviancy.
No.17080
>>17079No I'm not because I am condemning pedophilia but I do so only because it brings harm to people in real life. The moment that stops being the case is the moment I stop giving a fuck.
No.17081
>>17080>No I'm not because I am condemning pedophilia>but I do so only because it brings harm to people in real life. So a pedophile who jerks off to cp is okay? He's not hurting people in "real life" right? Go fuck yourself. You're morally bankrupt trash.
No.17082
>>17081No because in order for that cp to be created in the first place a child needed to be harmed and is still being harmed by having his/her's pictures out there for people to do with as they please. In OP's case he brings up artificial cp which harm's no one.
No.17083
Because it wouldn't be harming anyone when the constructs of our pedo-run society inevitably collapse and paedophiles go around molesting children because there's on police or state.
No.17084
>>17082So you aren't morally opposed to pedophilia because that would require condemning someone, you just dislike practicing pedophiles. But you're okay when they jerk off to veeeeery realistic looking children with the same intent as they would with real ones: the result of them watching fake cp is the same with real cp, they both desire children and want to fulfill that desire. Why don't you just grow some balls and say they'll burn in hell for being kid diddling perverts
No.17085
>>17084I don't have a problem with condemning people but I can't condem people over nothing. My conditions for condemning someone is based on whether they're causing harm to other people, nothing more nothing less.
No.17090
Go back to KC you fucking faggots, this place is dedicated to anime and soyjaks and neither of those include discussions about pedokikery